This competency can be demonstrated in different ways, and candidates often approach it from either personal leadership or leading others. A common weakness in submissions is an overemphasis on task-level detail (such as step-by-step training or procedure-writing) rather than clearly articulating leadership behaviours and impact.
Strong submissions clearly demonstrate how the candidate has taken initiative, shown ownership, and reflected on their development. Assessors are typically looking for a structured and specific example that includes:
Ownership and initiative:A candidate takes the lead on resolving a key issue or delivers a project outside their usual responsibilities, demonstrating accountability and proactive decision-making.
Leading and developing others:A candidate manages or supports junior team members, showing how they provided guidance, motivation, and contributed to team effectiveness. This is particularly relevant in environments such as audit where team leadership is common.
Candidates should provide evidence of actively demonstrating leadership through:
Importantly, candidates should focus on leadership behaviours and impact, rather than detailed descriptions of tasks or processes.