PER Community

 View Only

Common Reasons why PER Applications were deferred June 2026- Part Two 

06-05-2026 03:58 AM

1. Measuring Performance

⚠️ Assessor Feedback

  • Limited or unclear explanation of how performance was measured
  • KPIs not clearly defined or linked to objectives
  • Lack of detail on:
    • What was measured (team, department, project)
    • How performance was assessed
  • No clear identification of variances (actual vs target)
  • Actions are too brief and do not demonstrate how issues were addressed
  • Limited evidence of positive impact from actions taken

What the Assessor Is Looking For

Assessors expect:

  • Clear description of what area was measured
  • Specific KPIs identified (e.g. cost, turnaround time, accuracy)
  • Explanation of how performance was measured, including:
    • Tools or systems used
    • Frequency (e.g. weekly, monthly)
  • Clear identification of variances between actual and expected results
  • Explanation of:
    • Causes of variances
    • Actions taken to address them
    • Resulting improvements
  • Clear focus on your role and contribution

What Strong “Actions” Should Include

  • Monitoring KPIs and comparing against targets
  • Identifying and analysing key variances
  • Investigating root causes of underperformance
  • Communicating findings to stakeholders
  • Implementing corrective actions (e.g. process improvements, controls)
  • Tracking performance post-implementation to ensure improvement

🔑 Key Takeaways

  • Clearly state KPIs and targets
  • Highlight variances (actual vs expected)
  • Provide specific corrective actions
  • Demonstrate measurable improvement
  • Focus on your contribution, not just team outcomes

2. Communication

⚠️ Assessor Feedback

  • Communication described is too brief and lacks detail
  • No clear explanation of frequency of communication with stakeholders
  • Stakeholders are not clearly identified
  • Lack of detail on:
    • Methods of communication (e.g. meetings, reports)
    • Purpose of communication regarding systems and processes
  • No clear example showing how communication improved outcomes
  • “Actions” are too brief and do not demonstrate how improvements were driven

What the Assessor Is Looking For

Assessors expect:

  • Clear identification of stakeholders involved
  • Explicit explanation of frequency of communication (e.g. daily, weekly, monthly)
  • Description of methods used (e.g. meetings, reports, dashboards)
  • Explanation of the purpose of communication (e.g. monitoring, issue resolution)
  • Clear link to systems and processes
  • Identification of:
    • Issues or inefficiencies raised through communication
    • Actions taken
    • Resulting improvements
  • Clear focus on your role and contribution

What Strong “Actions” Should Include

  • Establishing regular communication (e.g. weekly meetings, monthly reports)
  • Presenting insights on system or process performance
  • Gathering feedback from stakeholders
  • Identifying issues or inefficiencies through discussions
  • Proposing and implementing improvements
  • Monitoring progress and providing follow-up updates

🔑 Key Takeaways

  • Clearly state who you communicate with, how often, and how
  • Show how communication leads to identifying issues and taking action
  • Link communication directly to process or system improvements
  • Demonstrate measurable impact
  • Focus on your contribution, not just team activity

Statistics
0 Favorited
78 Views
1 Files
0 Shares
14 Downloads
Attachment(s)
png file
Screenshot 2026-06-05 155632.png   470 KB   1 version
Uploaded - 06-05-2026

Related Entries and Links

No Related Resource entered.